Stop Creating More Content.
There is a lot of pressure to keep creating.
If you run a business, you’re told to post consistently, send emails, publish articles, make videos, show up on LinkedIn, create lead magnets, start a podcast, and somehow keep feeding every platform that might put you in front of the people you want to reach.
The underlying assumption is that visibility requires volume. If people aren’t noticing you, perhaps you simply need to create more.
I don’t think most businesses have a content shortage.
I think they have an amplification problem.
They create something useful, share it once or twice, and immediately move on to the next thing. A thoughtful article gets published and disappears into an archive. A great conversation produces an idea that becomes one social post. A client asks a question that could spark an entire series of useful content, but the answer stays inside an email.
Then Monday rolls around, and we stare at an empty content calendar wondering what on earth we’re supposed to talk about next.
There’s a better way to think about this.
START WITH SOMETHING WORTH SAYING.
Before we talk about amplification, we have to talk about the idea itself.
Repurposing mediocre content doesn’t magically make it more valuable. Turning one forgettable post into seven forgettable posts simply gives people seven opportunities to ignore it.
The strongest content strategies don’t begin with a platform. They begin with something worth communicating: an idea, perspective, story, question, lesson, observation, or piece of expertise that genuinely matters to the people you want to reach.
That becomes the center.
From there, you can ask a much more interesting question than: What should I post today?
How many useful ways can I help this idea travel?
Maybe it becomes an article where you have room to explore the idea fully. A piece of that article becomes an email. One argument becomes a LinkedIn post. A useful list becomes a carousel. A strong sentence becomes a graphic. A question becomes a short video. The larger idea might even become a media pitch, a workshop, a podcast conversation, or a resource.
You aren’t saying the same thing over and over.
You’re giving one worthwhile idea more than one opportunity to reach someone.
THAT’S THE THINKING BEHIND THE SPIDER STRATEGY™.
I developed the Spider Strategy™ because I wanted a simple way to visualize something I had been doing throughout my communications career.
At the center of the web is your owned voice — the idea in the place you control. For many businesses, that might be an article on their website. It could also be a podcast episode, a newsletter, a video, a research report, or another substantial piece of original content.
Then the web begins to expand.
An email carries the idea to the people who already know you. Social content introduces different pieces of it to people who may not. A short video lets someone hear you explain it in your own voice. A media pitch can take the idea beyond your existing audience. A resource can help someone put it into practice.
Each extension has its own purpose, audience, and format.
But they all connect back to the same center.
One idea. Many intentional extensions.
That’s very different from filling a calendar with unrelated content simply because the calendar has empty boxes.
REPETITION ISN’T THE PROBLEM WE THINK IT IS.
One of the biggest barriers to amplification is the fear that people will notice we’re talking about the same thing again.
They probably won’t.
And if they do, that isn’t necessarily bad.
We experience our own content very differently from our audience because we are present for every stage of its creation. We thought about the idea before we wrote it. We edited it. We chose the image. We scheduled the email. We built the social post. By the time it reaches the public, we may already be thoroughly tired of it.
The person on the other side has experienced none of that.
They may miss the first post entirely. They may see the second while waiting in line for coffee and forget about it 30 seconds later. They might notice the third but not need the information yet. Then, three weeks later, the same core idea appears in their inbox at exactly the moment it becomes relevant.
That isn’t annoying repetition.
That’s communication.
Anyone who has spent time in public relations understands this instinctively. We don’t assume a message has done its job simply because we distributed a press release once. We look for different angles, audiences, spokespeople, opportunities, and ways into the story.
The core message may remain remarkably consistent.
The expression changes.









